ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: New York City (NYC) emergency departments (EDs) experienced a surge of patients because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in March 2020. NYC Health and Hospitals established rapid medical screening exams (MSE) and each hospital designated areas to perform their MSE. Five of the 11 hospitals created a forward treatment area (FTA) external to the ED to disposition patients before entering who presented with COVID-like symptoms. Three hospitals used paper-based, and 2 used an electronic medical record (EMR)-based MSE. This study evaluated the effectiveness of safely discharging patients home from the FTA while also evaluating the efficiency of using paper-based versus EMR-based MSEs. METHODS: Charts were reviewed using standardized data extraction templates. Patients discharged from the FTA were contacted by phone, and a structured interview captured additional data regarding subsequent clinical courses. Chi-square tests were used to compare proportions of patients hospitalized, as well as proportions of patients with vital signs recorded. Mortality rates were compared with Fisher exact test. A logistic regression model with fixed effects to account for clustering at hospitals was used to compare the odds of being sent to the ED for further evaluation based on vital signs and adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: Across 5 EDs, 3335 patients were evaluated in their FTAs from March 17, 2020, to April 27, 2020. A total of 970 (29.1%) patients were referred for further evaluation into the ED, of which 203 (20.9%) were hospitalized and 19 (2.0%) died. Of 2302 patients discharged from the FTA, 182 (7.9%) returned to the ED within 7 days, resulting in 42 (1.8%) hospitalizations and 7 (0.3%) deaths. Facilities using EMR-MSE discharged more patients from their FTA (81.9% vs 65.3%, P < 0.001) and had similar 7-day return (9.3% vs 7.1%, P = 0.055) and mortality rates (0.49% vs 0.20%, P = 0.251). CONCLUSION: MSEs in an FTA are an effective process to disposition patients safely in a high-volume situation. Differences exist in paper- versus EMR-based approaches, suggesting EMR-MSEs provide better data, efficiency, and effectiveness. This suggests prioritizing an EMR-based MSE should be considered in future circumstances.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe outcomes and associated characteristics of patients who were intubated during the initial (3/2020-4/2020) New York City surge of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) pandemic, during which time we were confronted by an unknown and unprecedented respiratory distress syndrome with extremely high degrees of morbidity and mortality. Our secondary aim was to analyze our physician's rapidly evolving approaches to COVID-19 airway management. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients intubated at two emergency departments (EDs) for COVID-19 suspected respiratory failure. In addition, a survey was done to analyze clinician airway management trends and attitudes as they evolved during that period. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Primary outcomes looked at the spectrum of mortality outcomes ranging from died on arrival (DOA) to the ED, died in the ED (DED), died an inpatient (DIH), and survival to discharge. Overall mortalitywas 71.6% with an average age of 62.7 years. Female sex, as a demographic, was associated with higher rates of survival to discharge at 42.3% when compared to males at 23.2% (P < 0.001). Mean age was 70.8 years DOA, 65.6 years DED, 62.9 years DIH, and 60.0 years for survivors (P = 0.0037). Initial lactate levels were 8.15 mmol/L DED, 3.56 mmol/L DIH, and 2.61 mmol/L survivors (P < 0.0001). Initial creatinine levels were 3.38 mg/dL DED, 1.94 mg/dL DIH, and 1.77 mg/dL survivors (P = 0.0073). D-dimer levels were 7520.5 ng/mL DED, 5932.4 ng/mL DIH, and 1133.9 ng/mL survivors (P = 0.0045). Physician survey respondents reported high levels (69%) of laryngeal edema and prolonged post intubation hypoxia (>50% of time) and >80% remained concerned for their safety. There was a dramatic shift from early (73% of time) to late intubation strategies (67% of time) or non-invasive approaches (28% of time) as the first surge of the pandemic evolved. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that several demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters correlated with mortality in our cohort of patients intubated during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. These included male sex, advanced age, high levels of initial lactic acidosis, elevated D-dimer, and chronic kidney disease/acute kidney injury. In contrast, presenting respiratory characteristics were not correlated with mortality. In addition, our findings demonstrate that physician attitudes and strategies related to COVID-19 airway management evolved significantly and rapidly over the initial phase of the pandemic.